-
And Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts said the president was using “the specter of terrorism” to push his own agenda.
“If the telecommunications companies didn’t break the law, they do not need immunity,” the senator said. “If they broke the law, the American people deserve to know the size and scope of their lawbreaking. Adhering to the rule of law would not ‘aid our enemies’ — it would uphold the very principles we are fighting for. The President’s position has nothing to do with protecting Americans and everything to do with sweeping under the rug illegal activity by his administration and his corporate partners.”
- Bush Calls Surveillance Bill an ‘Urgent Priority’
If there was illegal activity, Senator, why no impeachment?!?!
There's more than enough evidence of wrongdoing. There should be impeachment. There needs to be impeachment.
(Also, there needs to be no immunity or warrantless wiretapping of Americans in FISA, too!)
BTW, Sean posted a very funny link in a comment on the Olbermann post... the following quote and picture are from the article:
Commenting on the action, and responding to questions about pending privacy litigation and the stalled Congressional effort to shield the telecoms from these lawsuits, NSA spokesperson [REDACTED] remarked: "[REDACTED] we [REDACTED] condone [REDACTED] warrantless [REDACTED], [REDACTED] SIGINT intercepts, [REDACTED] torture [REDACTED] information retrieval by [REDACTED] means necessary."
- NSA Gets the Best AT&T Coverage Around




